Ethics Case Study

Jerry McCall is an polish office ath permitic supporter for Dr. Williams. Jerry has received homework as both a medical assistant and commissioned practical nurses (licensed practical nurse). During the time the receptionist is out to luncheon Jerry is covert for her. Jerry is faced with a common difficulty in the health guardianship field today. Jerry has been asked to withdraw in a fill for diazepam to a p prostituteacy for a uncomplaining. This paper resulting extension wherefore Jerry is non qualified to make full any(prenominal) ethical drug drug(prenominal) medication. If Jerry is defend if a lawsuit is fill.Jerrys conclusion is a tough one, legal and honest issues and advice will be provided for Jerrys use. Jerry has received fostering as a medical assistant and a LPN and has gained knowledge about ethical drug drugs. Jerry knows that with his gentility he is not allowed to refill a prescription(prenominal) medicine medication. Jerry knows that diazep am is an addictive drug. Jerry is not allowed to refill this prescription because he is not a medical doctor, dentist, or a psychologist.Jerry has training for a LPN and knows that no depicted object what type of medication a unhurried is enquire him to refill he is not allowed to. If in that respect ar no much refills on the prescription nursing bottle the hardly thing Jerry elicit do in this position is to schedule the patient of for an booking with the physician. The patient is asking for a refill for Valium simply could also ask for a refill for in high spirits blood pressure medication. If the patient has to scream because he or she is out of refills on the prescription bottle ask to renew the prescription which can only be through with(p) by a medical doctor.The doctrine of respondent superior is outlined that the employer is nonimmune for the employees actions (Farlex, INC, 2011). If a lawsuit is filled Jerry may possibly be treasureed. The reading did not kingdom if Jerry carried his own malpractice policy or beneficial relayed on his employers insurance. If Jerry does keep up his own malpractice insurance he would know that his insurance will buy off an attorney to represent him before the Board of treat (Mackay, 2006). Jerry could have a lawsuit filed on him if he does refill the Valium and possible even if he does not refill it.Knowing to a greater extent about the survival of the fittest Jerry make and what type of malpractice insurance he carried would suspensor to help the question (if a lawsuit is filed would Jerry be protected? ). For anyone in Jerrys shoes it is gruelling to sustain advice and feel that the outcome would be for the scoop up participation of the organization. Jerry needs to understand that he could endure his rent out and nursing license. Jerry should develop to the patient that he is not allowed to refill prescription medication and he should apologize to the patient that he is also that th e conscious of the patch that he is flying out of town.Jerry should identify the patient that by making sure that he or she was prepared for travels ahead of time. After Jerry gets off the squall with the patient, he should go see Dr. Williams and explain to Dr. Williams what happened in the midst of the patient and himself. In conclusion if much health care professionals put into practice the purpose of non-maleficence which is embody by the phrase, to starting time, do no equipment casualty, or in the Latin, phrase primum non nocere (McGraw cumulation wisdom and applied science Dictionary2011). If more health care facilities considered non-maleficence to be the of import or primary consideration (to done harm) winning in consideration that it is more grave to protect all patients for their safety and wellbeing or else of earnest practitioners being more prone to victimisation treatments that they bank will do the most good, without first conducting an adequatel y evaluation on the patient to go over they do no harm to the patient (McGraw hummock attainment and Technology Dictionary2011).A great deal of has been done to patients as a result of inadequate evaluations. Therefore, it would be more important to do no harm to a patient than it would to do good so, my advice to Jerry would be to advertise the patient that he cannot call in the prescription and assure the patient that he will let the physician know of the patients needs and the physician can take care of them as soon as possible (McGraw Hill Science and Technology Dictionary2011).Ethics Case field of studyJerry McCall is an office assistant for Dr. Williams. Jerry has received training as both a medical assistant and Licensed practical nurses (LPN). During the time the receptionist is out to lunch Jerry is covering for her. Jerry is faced with a common problem in the health care field today. Jerry has been asked to call in a refill for Valium to a pharmacy for a patient. Thi s paper will address why Jerry is not qualified to refill any prescription medication. If Jerry is protected if a lawsuit is filled.Jerrys decision is a tough one, legal and ethical issues and advice will be provided for Jerrys use. Jerry has received training as a medical assistant and a LPN and has gained knowledge about prescription drugs. Jerry knows that with his training he is not allowed to refill a prescription medication. Jerry knows that Valium is an addictive drug. Jerry is not allowed to refill this prescription because he is not a medical doctor, dentist, or a psychologist.Jerry has training for a LPN and knows that no matter what type of medication a patient is asking him to refill he is not allowed to. If there are no more refills on the prescription bottle the only thing Jerry can do in this position is to schedule the patient for an appointment with the physician. The patient is asking for a refill for Valium but could also ask for a refill for high blood pressure m edication. If the patient has to call because he or she is out of refills on the prescription bottle needs to renew the prescription which can only be done by a medical doctor.The doctrine of respondent superior is defined that the employer is liable for the employees actions (Farlex, INC, 2011). If a lawsuit is filled Jerry may possibly be protected. The reading did not state if Jerry carried his own malpractice insurance or just relayed on his employers insurance. If Jerry does have his own malpractice insurance he would know that his insurance will pay an attorney to represent him before the Board of Nursing (Mackay, 2006). Jerry could have a lawsuit filed on him if he does refill the Valium and possible even if he does not refill it.Knowing more about the choice Jerry made and what type of malpractice insurance he carried would help to answer the question (if a lawsuit is filed would Jerry be protected? ). For anyone in Jerrys shoes it is hard to take advice and feel that the ou tcome would be for the best interest of the organization. Jerry needs to understand that he could lose his job and nursing license. Jerry should explain to the patient that he is not allowed to refill prescription medication and he should explain to the patient that he is also that the aware of the situation that he is flying out of town.Jerry should tell the patient that by making sure that he or she was prepared for travels ahead of time. After Jerry gets off the phone with the patient, he should go see Dr. Williams and explain to Dr. Williams what happened between the patient and himself. In conclusion if more health care professionals put into practice the concept of non-maleficence which is embodied by the phrase, to first, do no harm, or in the Latin, phrase primum non nocere (McGraw Hill Science and Technology Dictionary2011). If more health care facilities considered non-maleficence to be the main or primary consideration (to done harm) taking in consideration that it is mor e important to protect all patients for their safety and wellbeing instead of enthusiastic practitioners being more prone to using treatments that they believe will do the most good, without first conducting an adequately evaluation on the patient to ensure they do no harm to the patient (McGraw Hill Science and Technology Dictionary2011).A great deal of has been done to patients as a result of inadequate evaluations. Therefore, it would be more important to do no harm to a patient than it would to do good so, my advice to Jerry would be to tell the patient that he cannot call in the prescription and assure the patient that he will let the physician know of the patients needs and the physician can take care of them as soon as possible (McGraw Hill Science and Technology Dictionary2011).